Wyler Summit v. Turner Broadcasting

 

Issue: When can a person waive a condition in the contract?

Answer and Rule: A contracting party may waive conditions placed in a contract soley for that party’s benefit. “The law will not compel a man to insist upon any benefit or advantage secured to him individually.”

But: R2K 84(1): Waiver may not operate to materially alter the parties agreed upon exchange.

 

Facts: In 1958 William Wyler directed Ben Hur for MGM. Part of his compensation was a 3% royalty that kicked in after the movie grossed 20 million. Since the tax rate for income over $100K was 89%, he wanted a clause saying the royalties would be paid in annual installments of 50K or less. (However, the contract didn’t give the reason for the annual installments since that would have Wyler in trouble with the IRS.) 

 

Fortunately for Wyler (or unfortunately for his heirs) the tax rate went down, the value of money went down (50K then is worth about 300K today) and Ben Hur did extremely well. So well in fact that when Wyler died he had 1.5 million dollars sitting in a bank account and earning interest for MGM (now Turner).

 

Procedure: Wyler’s heirs sent a letter to Turner saying that the 50K installment plan was in fact a condition placed in the contract solely for Wyler’s benefit.  Since the heirs were willing to waive the condition, they figured Turner should send them the million five. Turner refused.

 

The Wylers sued Turner for breach of contract.

Turner filed for dismissal under Rule 12b6.

The district court dismissed the case because the clause benefited Turner (MGM) as well and therefore could not be unilaterally waived.

 

On appeal the 9th Circuit, 1998

reversed and remanded

saying that the trial court made a few mistakes:

 

1) Procedurally the trial court was supposed to accept the claims in the complaint as true; therefore they shouldn’t worry about whether the clause benefited Wyler or Wyler and Turner(MGM).

2) If they were going to worry about the truth of the claim they should at least have heard some evidence to determine whether there was a genuine issue of material fact.

 

Judge Tashima’s Dissent:

 

1) The Wyler’s complaint doesn’t actually say “for Wyler’s sole benefit” so why should the trial court have to assume this is true.  He also thinks that there is no need for evidence in order to determine what anyone with common sense can see: both parties benefit.

2) R2K § 84 bars the waiver since Turner’s loss of $90K per year in interest would “materially alter” the exchange.

3) Usually waiver happens when a party, who is excused from performance because of the non-occurrence of a condition, renounces his excuse and performs anyway. But Wyler’s performance is already complete so how can he waive anything?

 

Can You Believe They Are Still Litigating This Thing?

So if you were lying awake at night wondering whether the Wyler’s ever got their money. The answer is “No, but they are still in the game.”

 

Prof. Markell sent me a new opinion from the 9th circuit.  Apparently on remand the Wylers presented (depositions of) parole evidence implying the annual payment plan was not for Turner’s(MGM’s) benefit. Turner’s lawyers presented some evidence to refute that. They also thought up a bunch of new arguments for why the trial court should make the case go away.

 

The trial court agreed with Turner and granted summary judgment.

 

But on appeal the 9th circuit reverses and remands again saying that the Wyler’s heirs met the burden necessary to defeat summary judgment and their case should go to trial.

 

The most influential witness is someone who was actually there.  The deposition of  Leon Kaplan, who was part of Wyler’s negotiating team in 1958, states that no one ever discussed a  benefit for Turner (MGM). The other witnesses say conflicting things about the corporate tax climate in 1958 and entertainment industry practices of forty years ago.

 

The court thinks Leon Kaplan’s deposition is good evidence.  And that the credibility of the other witnesses should be decided by a jury. It sends the case, yet again…back to the trial court.  But, it refuses to grant the Wyler’s request for a new judge.

 

Things You Don’t Need to Know

MGM took a fairly big risk with Ben Hur.  It took six years and $15 million (most money ever spent on a movie back then) to make. Since then only one movie, Titanic, has tied Ben Hur’s record of 11 Oscars.

 

William Wyler started his career in Hollywood in 1927.  He did quite a few Westerns then branched out. Other films include: Mrs. Miniver, The Little Foxes, Wuthering Heights, and Funny Girl.

 

Website with more info on Ben Hur: www.greatestfilms.org/benh.html